|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Reliability
- Improved likelihood for greater success in adverse conditions
- Quality
- Unique basis for screening raw data and so producing higher quality
results
- Performance
- More precise data and unique measurements not possible with 3 beams
|
|
3
|
- For optimal conditions, 3 beams are sufficient for measuring 3-d motion
- But how often are field conditions optimal?Ý More often field conditions are demanding
- So the prudent operator will rely on more than the minimum requirement
|
|
4
|
- More information about currents through water column, vehicle velocity
over bottom
- Ping-by-ping evaluation of data quality permits identifying outliers
before they corrupt the average value
- Measurement redundancy for each layer in current profile and in bottom
tracking
- More adaptable configuration for difficult measurement situations
|
|
5
|
- Provides back-up or redundant capability, acting as a fail-safe when the
unfortunate happens
- Reduces concern about lost time, having to repeat work, and coming home
empty-handed
- 3-d velocities can still be computed even if one beam is blocked or
damaged, degraded by fish, faded at depth
|
|
6
|
- Allows deployment flexibility, keep working around underwater
obstructions
- Produces superior bottom tracking results, reduces dropouts
- Enhances operator safety in floods, reliable results reduce time
required on the water
|
|
7
|
- Evaluates how well all beams see the same flow field => affects
noise, bias in data
- Provides a quantitative basis for QA/QC at each depth layer of each ping
- Enables superior screening of raw data, allows greater certainty of
quality of results
|
|
8
|
- Provides a far more sensitive screen for data quality than can be
achieved by inspecting echo intensity
- Establishes a unique and independent basis for addressing questions
about data quality
|
|
9
|
- Screens each ping for unacceptable noise in the data
e.g., due to fish, turbulence, or eddy variability
- Detects consistent obstructions from solid scatterers => causing bias
in the data
- Provides an adaptive measure of the variance of horizontal flow
|
|
10
|
- ÝA 4-beam system has 25% less
variance than a 3-beam system
- Produces lower standard deviation in the data and allows shorter
averaging times
- Enables improved navigation and finer along-track resolution
|
|
11
|
- Consumes NO more energy than a 3-beam system (for same noise in data)
- Janus Configuration enables scientific measurements not possible with 3
beams
e.g., Reynolds stress estimation for sediment transport or mixing
|
|
12
|
- Reliability
- Improved likelihood for greater success in adverse conditions
- Quality
- Unique basis for screening raw data and so producing higher quality
results
- Performance
- More precise data and unique measurements not possible with 3 beams
|