Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Data QA/QC
(Quality Assurance/Quality Control)
  • Introduction to RDI's
    Data Quality Indicators
2
Having 4 beams enables a unique screening of raw data, producing higher quality results
  • Evaluates how well all beams see the same flow field => affects noise, bias in data
  • Provides a quantitative basis for QA/QC at each depth layer of each ping
  • Enables superior screening of raw data, allows greater certainty of quality of results
3
Data Quality
  • Philosophy: Quality vs. quantity
    • An 80/20 rule often applies to
      • Content of a data series
      • Time consumed by data reduction
  • Taking advantage of RDI's unique data quality indicators permits more efficient data reduction
    • Identifying both poor and high quality data segments
    • Permitting faster production of results and reports.
4
What is unique to RDI?
  • 4 beams permit immediate ping-by-ping error detection via redundant information
    (cf. Packet-by-packet checking in digital messages in telecoms)
  • BroadBand signaling takes multiple samples within a single ping => statistical indicators of single-ping quality
  • Advantage: QA/QC on a ping-by-ping basis maximizes the volume of high quality signal recorded
5
RDI's Data Quality Indicators
  • Quality of processed data: Error Velocity
    • Variability of velocity data
  • Informational content in signal: Correlation
    • Velocity Signal Strength in received echo
  •  Strength of received signal : Echo Intensity
    • Changes in Received Signal Strength
    • Consistency between beams
6
Using Error Velocity
  • Focus: Quality of processed data
    • Measures variability of velocity data
  • Provides a far more sensitive screen for data quality than can be achieved by inspecting echo intensity
  • Screens each ping for unacceptable noise in the data
    ( e.g., due to fish, turbulence, or eddy variability), maximizes the volume of high quality signal recorded
  • Detects consistent obstructions from solid scatterers => causing bias in the data
7
Using Correlation
  • Focus: Informational content in signal
    • Measures velocity signal strength in echo
  • Causes of poor correlation
    • Low signal-to-noise ratio in returned echo
    • Too much variability in the velocity signal returned from depth cell
      • Rapidly varying scatterers
      • Diverse Doppler shifts
8
Decorrelation:
Rapidly Varying Scatterers
  • Causes
    • Turbulence and Boat Heave: scatterers move rapidly between bins (or along beam)
    • High boat speed, Pitch and Roll: scatterers move rapidly across beam (short residence time)
  • Options to improve correlation
    • Slow down.. Scatterers move across beam slower
    • Use larger bins.. fractional change in scatterers is less
    • Increase ambiguity velocity
    • Find another measurement section
9
Decorrelation:
Diverse Doppler shifts
  • Causes
    • High Shear: velocity changes too much across the depth of the bin (especially the ambiguity resolving bin)
    • Beam divergence: differences between
      Doppler shifts measured at edges of beams become greater at higher speed
  • Options to improve correlation
    • Smaller bins.. Reduce range of velocities in cell
    • Slow down.. Reduce range between Doppler shifts measured at beam edges
10
Using Echo Intensity
  • Focus: Strength of received signal
  • Strength of backscattering reveals
    • Amount and patchiness of scatterers
    • Acoustic energy into the water
    • Bottom depth
    • Consistency between beams
  • Anomalies in backscattering permit detection of
    potential Doppler contamination
    • Fish
    • "2nd bounce" off hard bottom
11
Data Display and Review
  • Refining Data Quality: typically an Iterative cycle
    • Control: Data screening
      • Objective checking of numbers => machine
    • Assurance: Data review
      • Subjective checking of patterns => person
  • 2-D contour plots, 1-D Displays
    • Reveal patterns of variation with both depth & time/distance
    • Vertical profiles, Tables (see variation with depth)
    • Time series (see variation vs. time--for one depth cell)
    • Ship-track (see variation vs. distance traveled)
12
Checking Data Quality
  • Times
    • At ADCP installation
      • Anticipate sources of data contamination
    • Acquisition
      • Confirm data quality
    • Playback
      • Refine data quality via review & reprocess
13
Data Acquisition
  • Emphasis: Avoid bad data, Confirm data quality
  • Configurable Thresholds for Screening
    • Error Velocity, Correlation, Fish detection
  • Difficult Environments for Quality Data
    • Highly dynamic ADCP motions
    • Bottom tracking over soft bottom
    • Water tracking in highly variable water conditions
        • 2-d, 3-d turbulent motions, extreme shear
        • Rocky bottom, schools of fish
14
Data Playback
  • Emphasis: Review data and retain high quality
    • Sequence for shooting-trouble:
      • Error Velocity => Correlation => Echo Intensity
  • Using Data Quality Indicators
    • Set values: Error Velocity, Vertical Velocity, Fish detection
    • Review Patterns: Echo Intensity, Correlation, Error Velocity
    • Re-processing: Option for 3-beam processing where data drop-outs occur on one beam