|
1
|
- Discussion of Concepts
- re
- How It Works
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Water speed: Uwater = C/2 x p / (Df x Tapart )
- p is determined from autocovariance function (acvf) of echo time series
for each depth cell
- ACVF tells the average delay and similarity between recurring patterns
in a time series
- ACVF outputs correlation
- Measure of similarity between recurring patterns
- Says how well you detect and measure pulse separation
- Key point
- Low correlation => poor estimate of water velocity
- i.e., sd (p) varies inversely with correlation
|
|
4
|
- Water speed: Uwater= C/2 x p / (Df x Tapart )
- p = N x carrier cycles + fraction of cycle
- (1) (2)
- Complex autocovariance function has 2 types of information
- Magnitude (correlation): used to measure (1)
- Phase information: used to measure (2)
- Key point
- Phase values are only reliable if correlation is high
- Poor correlation results in noisy (or none) water velocity measurements
|
|
5
|
- Water speed: Uwater= C/2 x p / (Df x Tapart )
- p = N x carrier cycles + fraction of cycle
- (1) (2)
- Standard deviation of Uwater = sd (Uwater)
- sd (Uwater) = C/2 x 1/ (Df x Tapart ) x
sd (p )
- Factors affecting sd (p )
- Part (1) .. *quantizing* noise (N±1)
- Parts (1), (2) .. correlation between 1st, 2nd pulses
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- ACVF => measures AVERAGE delay and similarity between patterns
recurring in a time series
- Poor correlation => due to TOO MUCH VARIABILITY in the delay or
similarity between these patterns over the duration of time series
- Consider separately 2 aspects of too much variability
- Delay between pulses
- Similarity between pulses
|
|
8
|
- Too much variability in the delay between pulses
- Blurs 2nd pulse and its average location when ACVF is computed for each
depth cell
- Result: Low correlation
=> noisy or no velocity
- Causes
- High Shear: velocity changes too much across the depth of the bin
(notably the ambiguity resolving bin)
- Beam divergence: differences between velocity measured at edges of
beams greater at higher speed
|
|
9
|
- Velocity profile vs. Pulse Separation in Echo
|
|
10
|
- Velocity shear vs. Pulse Separation in Echo
|
|
11
|
- Beam Width vs. Pulse Separation in Echo
|
|
12
|
- Options to improve correlation
- Smaller bins .. Reduce range of velocities in cell
- Slow down .. Reduce range between Doppler shifts measured at beam edges
|
|
13
|
- Too much variability in the similarity between pulses
- Back-scattering sources change too fast before the 2nd pulse arrives
- Degrades the *signature* of 2nd pulse compared with 1st pulse
- Result: Low correlation => noisy or no velocity
- Causes
- Turbulence and Boat Heave: scatterers move rapidly between bins (or
along beam)
- High boat speed, Pitch and Roll: scatterers move rapidly across beam
(short residence time)
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Options to improve correlation
- Slow down .. Scatterers move across beam slower
- Use larger bins .. fractional change in scatterers is less
- Increase ambiguity velocity (reduce inter-pulse delay at transmit) ..
2nd pulse arrives sooner after 1st pulse sees more of same scatterers
- Move measurement section to place with smoother bottom or calmer
surface .. Vertical water motions are reduced
|
|
16
|
- Discussion of Concepts
- re
- How It Works
|