|
1
|
- Discussion of Concepts
- re
- How It Works
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Echo time series is complex* superposition of echoes
- Ý *Many returns from
multiple
scatterers & locations
- In practice, you can't* measure delay between pulses by using time (per
se) (*Individual pulses do not appear like
- Measure phase lag between pulses and use it as a proxy for elapsed time
- Elapsed time = phase lag / frequency t = p / Df
- In echo series, Doppler-shifted carrier frequency is time base = Df
- This gives a new equation to calculate water speed Uwater =
C/2 x p / (Df x Tapart )
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Water speed: Uwater = C/2 x p / (Df x Tapart )
- RECAP: p is a proxy for elapsed time => measures change in pulse
separation
- But phase is periodic, repeating its value each 360 degrees
- So using Phase Lag introduces a potential source of ambiguity
- Ambiguity? Consider: Elapsed time = minutes + seconds
- For a stopwatch that has lost its minute digit, what is the elapsed
time?
REQUIRES: Another means for counting complete 60-s cycles
|
|
6
|
- Rearrange: Uwaterx Tapart = C/2 x p / Df
- Total phase lag, p = N x carrier cycles + fraction of cycle
- Larger Uwater produces bigger p (change in pulse separation)
- When p crosses ± 180 degrees then
N=1
- p and Uwater become ambiguous if N is unknown , Phase lags
of -210 and +150 have the same value
- Controlling ambiguity: make a choice re determining N
- Avoid the ambiguity (ensure N=0 at all times)
- Resolve the ambiguity: Count 360 deg. phase wraps
- Key Point: Important Difference between Profiling Modes
|
|
7
|
- Rearrange: Uwaterx Tapart = C/2 x p / Df
- p = N x carrier cycles + fraction of cycle
- (1) (2)
- At water velocity where p becomes ambiguous (± 180 degrees) then Uwaterx Tapart =
constant
- Choose small Tapart in transmitted pulse pair to set large
velocity before Uwater will be ambiguous
- Modes 1 and 12
|
|
8
|
- p = N x carrier cycles + fraction of cycle
- (1) (2)
- Knowing N in (1) resolves any ambiguity in p
- N is found by measuring average velocity in a specific, auto-selected
depth layer, called the ambiguity resolving bin (ARB)**
- Modes 5 and 11
- If N cannot be determined by the ARB, Modes 5 and 11 do not output
data.**
- **The ARB is set automatically. Changing it can ruin your day!
|
|
9
|
- RECAP: Uwater= C/2 x t / Tapart
- sd (Uwater) = C/2 x 1/ Tapart x sd ( t )
- Smaller Tapart => larger sd (Uwater)
- Key point: Sending Pulses close together
- Avoids complexity of resolving ambiguity
- COST: Higher variance (random noise on velocity profile)
- Advantages of pulses being close together (Mode 1, 12)
- More resistant to Decorrelation causes
- Measure higher speeds
- More robust ADCP operation under dynamic conditions
|
|
10
|
- Key point: Sending pulses farther apart
- Requires complexity of resolving ambiguity
- Advantages (Mode 5, 11)
- Lower variance in velocity profile
- Enables much finer resolution in data set (profile, time)
- Permits profiling shallower depths
- COST of pulses being farther apart
- More susceptible to Decorrelation causes
- Limits maximum measurable speed, profiling range
- Less robust ADCP operation under dynamic conditions
|
|
11
|
- p = N x carrier cycles + fraction of cycle
- (1) (2)
- Problems for determining (1) => Resolving ambiguity
- High Shear: Velocity changes too much across the depth of the ambiguity
resolving bin
- Turbulence or High boat speed: Back-scattering sources change too much
during time between pulses in pair
- Ý(Details are described in
Section titled Decorrelation Effects)
|
|
12
|
- Discussion of Concepts
- re
- How It Works
|